<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jindal VETOED!!  Asks the people for help!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bradford Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradford Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Email and call Bobby and let him know you appreciate his spineliness. Let him know that you have his back against any reprecussions from legislators.

Remember, the legislators who voted for this didn't veto it. They will start crawfishing and talking about what a good job they are doing, how they haven't had a payraise since 1980 (the none that are still there from 1980), and all that other sad stuff.

We eventually will decide on a payraise for our public servants. It will be on a ballot where we will vote up or down. So go back to the commission recommendations, all of them, not just cherrypick the ones you like.

When the payraise comes through in 3 years or so, the legislators who voted for this last one won't have this job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email and call Bobby and let him know you appreciate his spineliness. Let him know that you have his back against any reprecussions from legislators.</p>
<p>Remember, the legislators who voted for this didn&#8217;t veto it. They will start crawfishing and talking about what a good job they are doing, how they haven&#8217;t had a payraise since 1980 (the none that are still there from 1980), and all that other sad stuff.</p>
<p>We eventually will decide on a payraise for our public servants. It will be on a ballot where we will vote up or down. So go back to the commission recommendations, all of them, not just cherrypick the ones you like.</p>
<p>When the payraise comes through in 3 years or so, the legislators who voted for this last one won&#8217;t have this job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lege Watch &#187; We did it! Where do we go from here?</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Lege Watch &#187; We did it! Where do we go from here?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-461</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;re finished, we need to consider where we go from here at LegeWatch.  Two sentences of Governor Jindal&#8217;s statement deserve particular attention: “I know that some of the legislators are going to be upset that I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;re finished, we need to consider where we go from here at LegeWatch.  Two sentences of Governor Jindal&#8217;s statement deserve particular attention: “I know that some of the legislators are going to be upset that I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrTerry58</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>DrTerry58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-460</guid>
		<description>First everyone needs to pat themselves on the back for keeping the pressure on the Governor.  This is certain proof that persistence pays off.

Second I would like to thank those who set-up this site and others like it; THANK YOU.

While the rally has been canceled, I would offer this suggestion that perhaps we should have one at the beginning of the next session.  It would be a chance to show the Leges that we are still watching them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First everyone needs to pat themselves on the back for keeping the pressure on the Governor.  This is certain proof that persistence pays off.</p>
<p>Second I would like to thank those who set-up this site and others like it; THANK YOU.</p>
<p>While the rally has been canceled, I would offer this suggestion that perhaps we should have one at the beginning of the next session.  It would be a chance to show the Leges that we are still watching them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-459</guid>
		<description>To all of you, thank you for your kind words.  It was a heck  of a ride..and I am still flying....  I am so pleased that you will keep the site alive.

Do you  think that all of the legislators knew what Jindal was going to do this morning the day before the raise was to go into effect?  Did he drop a bomb on them?

Also, did anyone of you have  any suspicions that he might veto it today since today was June 30?  Most of us were praying and hoping for a veto by 11:59 pm  July 7th. 

Nick, did you mean SB223 was scortched by Jindal's veto pen also.   SB223 was a proposed legislative failure of Derrick Sheppard...Isn't he in trouble??  


For "satisfaction sake's", I noticed that WDSU (6) was more pro-citizen than WGNO (26) who entertained the author of SB672.  She was so arrogant and made comments like:  he is so young and he has lots to learn about relationships....I guess, in
"Duplessis language" that means that he has not become callous enough to learn how to wheel and deal, not care and  hide it from the citizens. Her interpretation:  his skin is still too thin!!??  

Then she had the bold arrogant audacity to say "that several radio talk show hosts orchestrated it and the public bought into it!"  This insulted me.  No talk show brought me anywhere...My moral compass directed me to my decision to speak up for what I believed was wrong and I let Jindal, and my rep and sen know how I felt about the raise...I also sent emails to legislators who were not my repersentatives....

She is disgusting and repulsive as she sat at her VP desk.
Her words and image  just enhance the negative perception the public has of her.  And who "authored and orchestrated SB672"  What a hypocritcal statement!!!

All I had to think about were the notes from SEnate Finance Committed meetings and Sen. Broome telling Duplessis:  YOu have so much courage to author this bill and get it to the floor favorably for discussion!!!!  

I did hear one interesting comment on one broadcast: now that 
Jindal did not let them have this raise this year, he will have to find a way to work with them to get one next year....  and I thought....NOT BY THE HAIR ON THE CHINNY, CHIN, CHIN OF EVERY CONSTITUENT WHO IS PAYING ATTENTION!!

So, our vigilance can not stop...

Also, what about the comment from Tucker:  the  Louisiana constitution allows the legislators to vote on their own raise, and so this needs to change...(something to this effect)

So, would this take a constitutional amendment?  How does this develop to bring it to a vote of the citizens?

I will go to sleep early and smile when I know that Ann D., J. Tucker, and all the rest of them will wake up tomorrow (if they sleep) WITHOUT A RAISE THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY OUR TAXES.
Thanks, Liz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all of you, thank you for your kind words.  It was a heck  of a ride..and I am still flying&#8230;.  I am so pleased that you will keep the site alive.</p>
<p>Do you  think that all of the legislators knew what Jindal was going to do this morning the day before the raise was to go into effect?  Did he drop a bomb on them?</p>
<p>Also, did anyone of you have  any suspicions that he might veto it today since today was June 30?  Most of us were praying and hoping for a veto by 11:59 pm  July 7th. </p>
<p>Nick, did you mean SB223 was scortched by Jindal&#8217;s veto pen also.   SB223 was a proposed legislative failure of Derrick Sheppard&#8230;Isn&#8217;t he in trouble??  </p>
<p>For &#8220;satisfaction sake&#8217;s&#8221;, I noticed that WDSU (6) was more pro-citizen than WGNO (26) who entertained the author of SB672.  She was so arrogant and made comments like:  he is so young and he has lots to learn about relationships&#8230;.I guess, in<br />
&#8220;Duplessis language&#8221; that means that he has not become callous enough to learn how to wheel and deal, not care and  hide it from the citizens. Her interpretation:  his skin is still too thin!!??  </p>
<p>Then she had the bold arrogant audacity to say &#8220;that several radio talk show hosts orchestrated it and the public bought into it!&#8221;  This insulted me.  No talk show brought me anywhere&#8230;My moral compass directed me to my decision to speak up for what I believed was wrong and I let Jindal, and my rep and sen know how I felt about the raise&#8230;I also sent emails to legislators who were not my repersentatives&#8230;.</p>
<p>She is disgusting and repulsive as she sat at her VP desk.<br />
Her words and image  just enhance the negative perception the public has of her.  And who &#8220;authored and orchestrated SB672&#8243;  What a hypocritcal statement!!!</p>
<p>All I had to think about were the notes from SEnate Finance Committed meetings and Sen. Broome telling Duplessis:  YOu have so much courage to author this bill and get it to the floor favorably for discussion!!!!  </p>
<p>I did hear one interesting comment on one broadcast: now that<br />
Jindal did not let them have this raise this year, he will have to find a way to work with them to get one next year&#8230;.  and I thought&#8230;.NOT BY THE HAIR ON THE CHINNY, CHIN, CHIN OF EVERY CONSTITUENT WHO IS PAYING ATTENTION!!</p>
<p>So, our vigilance can not stop&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, what about the comment from Tucker:  the  Louisiana constitution allows the legislators to vote on their own raise, and so this needs to change&#8230;(something to this effect)</p>
<p>So, would this take a constitutional amendment?  How does this develop to bring it to a vote of the citizens?</p>
<p>I will go to sleep early and smile when I know that Ann D., J. Tucker, and all the rest of them will wake up tomorrow (if they sleep) WITHOUT A RAISE THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FUNDED BY OUR TAXES.<br />
Thanks, Liz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G8trgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>G8trgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-458</guid>
		<description>LOL.......this is wayyyyyyyyyyyy off topic but um, how much longer you think Chad is gonna leave that picture of the girl in the bikini on his page?   LOL.....gaw Chad.....ya like her or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;&#8230;.this is wayyyyyyyyyyyy off topic but um, how much longer you think Chad is gonna leave that picture of the girl in the bikini on his page?   LOL&#8230;..gaw Chad&#8230;..ya like her or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G8trgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>G8trgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-457</guid>
		<description>liz thank you for your kind words......you have a been a champion of the cause from the get go yourself!!!!!  I actually deserve no praise though.......it goes most of all to laura for having the where-with-all to hatch this site and to nick for his absolutely wonderful journalism!!!!  Hats off to you both!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>liz thank you for your kind words&#8230;&#8230;you have a been a champion of the cause from the get go yourself!!!!!  I actually deserve no praise though&#8230;&#8230;.it goes most of all to laura for having the where-with-all to hatch this site and to nick for his absolutely wonderful journalism!!!!  Hats off to you both!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-456</guid>
		<description>The VETO is particularly sweet since the legislature chose to leave the pay raise for their aides behind on the cutting room floor.  (SB543).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The VETO is particularly sweet since the legislature chose to leave the pay raise for their aides behind on the cutting room floor.  (SB543).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-455</guid>
		<description>You are most certainly welcome.  It was a joy and a pleasure to be invited in to participate in this endeavor.

I feel great... 

Everyone at work seemed to have a big smile on their face after 11:00 today.  My phone rang of the hook.

Right now it is time to relax and decompress a bit.

Governor Jindal stepped up to the plate and did the right thing for the citizens of this state.  He didn't wait til the very last minute and by doing so he saved us a lot of time and work over the next week.  Thank you for that Gov.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are most certainly welcome.  It was a joy and a pleasure to be invited in to participate in this endeavor.</p>
<p>I feel great&#8230; </p>
<p>Everyone at work seemed to have a big smile on their face after 11:00 today.  My phone rang of the hook.</p>
<p>Right now it is time to relax and decompress a bit.</p>
<p>Governor Jindal stepped up to the plate and did the right thing for the citizens of this state.  He didn&#8217;t wait til the very last minute and by doing so he saved us a lot of time and work over the next week.  Thank you for that Gov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all the kind words, and more than anything, THANK YOU ALL FOR EVERYTHING YOU'VE DONE!!!

LegeWatch is going to keep going.  Obviously there is a real need for a watchdog organization to keep after the lege on a day to day basis and we're ready to do it.  We have to figure out a basic game plan, but if you read our Goals page you can see what we have in mind generally.

In any event, keep an eye on the site for more news on the lege.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all the kind words, and more than anything, THANK YOU ALL FOR EVERYTHING YOU&#8217;VE DONE!!!</p>
<p>LegeWatch is going to keep going.  Obviously there is a real need for a watchdog organization to keep after the lege on a day to day basis and we&#8217;re ready to do it.  We have to figure out a basic game plan, but if you read our Goals page you can see what we have in mind generally.</p>
<p>In any event, keep an eye on the site for more news on the lege.<br />
 <img src='http://www.legewatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.legewatch.com/2008/06/jindal-will-veto/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legewatch.com/?p=78#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Laura, Nick, G8trgirl:  thank you so much..I am not sure what your plans are for legewatch.com....If it has to fold, I commend you for all of your diligent wirj  and dedication  to this cause.  If legewatchcom  continues to exist, the next most important issue is to  build support  to make sure that  legislators can no longer vote on a raise for themselves.
Any suggestions to where does that path begin?  Certainly not with the legislators themselves.  I will ask Steve and CB what needs to be done.  INPUT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura, Nick, G8trgirl:  thank you so much..I am not sure what your plans are for legewatch.com&#8230;.If it has to fold, I commend you for all of your diligent wirj  and dedication  to this cause.  If legewatchcom  continues to exist, the next most important issue is to  build support  to make sure that  legislators can no longer vote on a raise for themselves.<br />
Any suggestions to where does that path begin?  Certainly not with the legislators themselves.  I will ask Steve and CB what needs to be done.  INPUT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  stristr() [<a href='function.stristr'>function.stristr</a>]: Empty delimiter. in <b>/home/lege/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wassup/wassup.php</b> on line <b>2093</b><br />
